>From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this could reveal
existings ones.
Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz
2010/10/31 Jeremy Leibs <
leibs@willowgarage.com>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have some concerns about content of ROS deb packages.
> > Every deb contains build dir, which is actually more than half of size of
> > package.
> > I some packeges use more than 1.5GB of disk space.
> > As far as i know content of build dirrectory is useless because it
> contain
> > paths used to build deb.
>
> Yes, we have been aware of this fact for a while and trying to remedy
> the situation. Unfortunately some of the ROS packages were previously
> linking against some of the libraries only stored in the build
> directory, and so removing them broke things. We opted to leave them
> in since the only impact was on filesize. The build system is now
> purging them in the "unstable" line of debs, so they should definitely
> be gone from "diamondback" when it comes out. I don't know if we are
> planning to make a comparable change for cturtle since we don't want
> to introduce new bugs into our stable line of debs in the event that
> we don't catch a corner case.
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
(text/plain)