Re: [ros-users] Content of deb packages.

That sounds good.
I think that kind of packaging should be used for next release.
Keeping the old scheme packages will make migration to new one more
difficult, because potentially more and more packages can be build in bug
"faulty way".

Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz


2010/11/1 Jeremy Leibs <leibs@willowgarage.com>

> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Adam Leeper <aleeper@stanford.edu> wrote:
> > I disagree on removing sources... they are useful for reference (if you
> > can't get online) even if you aren't doing development on a package.
>
> Once we have a valid concept of an install target within the ros build
> system, I intend to automatically generate 3 debs per stack:
> - ros-<distroname>-<stackname> will contain the minimal "installed"
> version of the stack. Executables, libs, and exported headers only.
> - ros-<distroname>-<stackname>-src will additionally contain the
> rest of the source code for the stack.
> - ros-<distroname>-<stackname>-tests will contain the compiled
> unit-tests for the stack.
>
> >
> >
> > Adam Leeper
> > Stanford University
> > aleeper@stanford.edu
> > 719.358.3804
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I would go further and say that sources should be removed from debs.
> >> debs are not intended to be build by hand. If i want to do some devel on
> >> package, I will checkout code form svn.
> >> Pozdrawiam
> >> Konrad Banachowicz
> >>
> >>
> >> 2010/10/31 Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> But depending on a file which should not exist is not a bug ?
> >>> Pozdrawiam
> >>> Konrad Banachowicz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2010/10/31 Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <
> konradb3@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this
> could
> >>>> > reveal
> >>>> > existings ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> If something worked before, then starts failing because a file it
> >>>> depended on was purged from the package, that seems like a "new bug"
> >>>> to me.
> >>>> --
> >>>> joq
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ros-users mailing list
> >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org
> >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ros-users mailing list
> >> ros-users@code.ros.org
> >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-users mailing list
> > ros-users@code.ros.org
> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>