I going to do the release of my stacks. This would be 0.1 version
(completely experimental, unreviewed ).
So this would be good time to change names of those, if it's really
necessary.
I would like to know your opinions about names of my stack. And possibly
proposals for better ones.
Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz
2010/11/8 Konrad Banachowicz <
konradb3@gmail.com>
> 2010/11/8 Herman Bruyninckx <Herman.Bruyninckx@mech.kuleuven.be>
>
>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Peter Soetens wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday 08 November 2010 09:57:30 Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
>> >> FYI
>> >>
>> >> <http://www.ros.org/wiki/orocos_controllers>
>> >> To what extent are orocos developers involved in this? Should we?
>> >
>> > I have been silently tracking the mails on ros-users, being tempted to
>> jump
>> > in.
>> >
>> > The name is a bit ambiguous from a 'branding' point of view (who is
>> > responsible for that code), but I'm still in a wait-and-see mode and I
>> applaud
>> > any attempt of someone trying to set one up that integrates nicely with
>> ROS.
>> > It's only by doing it that we can find out what works best...
>>
>> True. But the "branding" aspect should not be neglected. And I'm sure that
>> the initiative under consideration here is indeed laudable, but it would
>> have received a lot of help from this list _before_ it was released and
>> published as a ROS package...
>>
> The name of my stacks could be a bit ambiguous beceose i am not OROCOS
> developer, but it well describes content of those stacks. I have discussed
> design of those stacks on ros and orocos mailing-list. These stacks have not
> been released, but are publicly available. I thought that prof-of-concept
> implementation whould be good starting point for discution on future of
> OROCOS-ROS integration.
>
>>
>> Herman
>> --
>> Orocos-Dev mailing list
>> Orocos-Dev@lists.mech.kuleuven.be
>> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev
>>
>
>
(text/plain)