Re: [ros-users] Nodelets, image_transport, and shared_ptr

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] Nodelets, image_transport, and shared_ptr
If you publish a shared_ptr<sensor_msgs::Image> using raw transport,
image_transport takes advantage of roscpp's optimized intraprocess message
passing. So you can use image_transport to pass images in nodelets.

Generalizing image_transport to handle other representations - including
something like shared_ptr<cv::Mat> - is on my wishlist, but too invasive to
make it into Diamondback at this point.

Cheers,
Patrick

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Nicholas Butko <> wrote:

> In the nodelet documentation, it says that shared_ptr should be used for
> passing data, for efficiency reasons.
>
> Is this done by default in image_trasnport? If not, what is the preferred
> way to publish something like shared_ptr<cv::Mat>?
>
> --Nick
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>