On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Blaise Gassend <
blaise@willowgarage.com> wrote:
>> I'll leave it to Blaise and Patrick to decide if a test_camera_drivers
>> stack is a good idea.
>
> I have no objection to a test_camera_drivers stack. And it really
> isn't a lot of overhead. It would probably make sense for you to do
> the releases on it since it seems that for now you'd be the only one
> with stuff in there.
Blaise, my goal is to avoid adding otherwise unneeded dependencies on
image_pipeline and (perhaps) image_transport_plugins to the
camera_drivers stack. If that's not so important, then no test stack
would be needed.
Which seems better to you?
--
joq
(text/plain)