Re: [ros-users] Ubuntu 10.10 support

Along these same lines, does WG have any official or unofficial stance between 32-bit and 64-bit Ubuntu?

Given a 64-bit processor, Is one generally considered better, or more widely used, than the other?

I noticed in the nite package, there were only 64-bit binary libraries, for example. Does this generally cause linking errors or other weird behavior on 32-bit Ubuntu?

--Nick

On Dec 12, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Ken Conley wrote:

> Hi Sudeep,
>
> We build debs for 10.10. You can check the status here:
>
> http://www.ros.org/debbuild/cturtle.html
>
> You'll see that a couple of stacks (e.g. image_transport_plugins) are
> not supported on Maverick, but the vast majority are.
>
> - Ken
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Sudeep Pillai
> <fuzzy.singular@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I want to know if there is any issue with moving to ubuntu 10.10 and using
>> ROS. I build CTurtle mostly via svn, git etc. I would imagine that there
>> won't be any issue with building from source, but I just want to double
>> check before I take the step.
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Sudeep Pillai | fuzzy.singular@gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users