Re: [ros-users] Diamondback Desktop-full variant and rxtools…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] Diamondback Desktop-full variant and rxtools/documentation
Thanks for the report. desktop now extends ros-full, and I've updated
the rosdep rule as well.

regards,
Ken

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:43 PM, William Woodall <> wrote:
> I was trying out the Diamondback Beta on my macbook and I started out trying
> the desktop-full variant.  I noticed, however, that this doesn't pull in the
> rx and documentation stacks (doesn't extend the rose-full variant).  I was
> wondering if this was intentional.  I solved the problem in the short term
> by rosinstall'ing the ros-full variant to pull these in.  The reason I ask
> is that desktop-full pulls rviz, but rviz seemed to need the rx stack to
> compile...
> Also, for the rosdep.yaml on OS X using macports, wxpython calls for the
> python-cairo package which doesn't exist.  This package is actually called
> py26-cairo in macports.
>
> Thanks,
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> William Woodall
> Graduate Software Engineering
> Auburn University
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>