Re: [ros-users] Unknown error initiating TCP/IP socket

Forside
Vedhæftede filer:
Indlæg som e-mail
+ (text/plain)
Slet denne besked
Besvar denne besked
Skribent: User discussions
Dato:  
Til: User discussions
Emne: Re: [ros-users] Unknown error initiating TCP/IP socket
I will answer your e-mail when I have time, but in the meantime:

http://www.ros.org/wiki/Support#Guidelines_for_asking_a_question_.28Please_read_before_posting.29

"Please don't send your question more than once: The question was
seen. If you didn't get a response then likely nobody has had time to
answer you. Alternatively, it could be that nobody knows the answer.
In any case, sending it again is poor form and akin to shouting and is
likely to aggravate a large number of people. This also applies to
crossposting. Try to pick the forum which you think matches best and
ask there. If you are referred to a new forum, provide a link to the
old discussion. "


On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Tom Sgouros <> wrote:
> Just to put it out there again in case anyone missed it in the Friday
> afternoon slowdown, does anyone have some insight into this error?
> Thank you,
>  -tom
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Tom Sgouros <> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all:
>> Can anyone tell me what this error implies?
>> [rospy.internal][WARNING] 2011-09-30 12:02:32,391: Unknown error
>> initiating TCP/IP socket to tahoma:56716 (http://tahoma:32771/): Traceback
>> (most recent call last):
>>   File
>> "/opt/ros/diamondback/stacks/ros_comm/clients/rospy/src/rospy/impl/tcpros_base.py",
>> line 474, in connect self.read_header()
>>   File
>> "/opt/ros/diamondback/stacks/ros_comm/clients/rospy/src/rospy/impl/tcpros_base.py",
>> line 526, in read_header
>>     self._validate_header(read_ros_handshake_header(self.socket,
>> self.read_buff, self.protocol.buff_size))
>>   File "/opt/ros/diamondback/ros/core/roslib/src/roslib/network.py", line
>> 350, in read_ros_handshake_header
>>     d = sock.recv(buff_size)
>> error: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer
>> I get this infrequently, but often enough to be a nuisance, say after ten
>> or twenty minutes of operation.  The message implies that it's only a
>> warning, but one of the nodes on which I see it becomes unaccountably silent
>> when it happens.
>> Thank you,
>>  -Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
>
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>