Re: [ros-users] libopencv

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: ros-users
Subject: Re: [ros-users] libopencv
A Dijous 10 Novembre 2011, Jochen Sprickerhof va escriure:
> * Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <> [2011-11-10 18:03]:
> [..]
> > well, I agree with you. It's frustrating for the Debian people (at last

for
> > me) cannot compile (or create) the debs packages of ros. Also, I would

like to
> > introduce the problem that for a system admin, like me, ros works so well

in a
> > box alone, with one user that it's also root(sudo), but it's not easy to
> > maintain a group of boxes with ros if you don't want to give sudo

permissions
> > to the users.
>
> what's your problem here? Apart from ps3joy.py (which could run as a
> service) and sixpair I haven't found a problem till now.


well my problem is basically that I don't have packages for a debian
distribution. So, if you have a group of boxes and a group of users that use
ros, you have to take care how to install ros in the different boxes.

If the boxes are similar (amd64 or i386) you can make one installation and
then rsync between boxes or share the directory (nfs, samba, etc).

Another problem is that the default umask in a debian distro is 0022 or 0002,
so you have to take care that all the users have the umask adecuately in the
way that if they compile a package, all the users group could erase or
recompile that package.

But, OTOH maybe I'm wrong and maintain a ros installation is more easy and I
don't know how to do it. Probably some advices about of a multi-user/ multi-
system could be a good information.

Regards,

Leo

Ps I would like to mention that the people, IMHO are using the "concept"
debian packages [1]. To me, these are not "debian packages" are ubuntu
packages or debs packages (as rpm)

[1] http://www.ros.org/wiki/electric/Installation/Ubuntu


--
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia