Re: [ros-users] Depth image REP

Thanks for the clarification Patrick.

+0, then

-Ryan

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Patrick Mihelich <mihelich@willowgarage.com
> wrote:

> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ryan Gariepy <
> rgariepy@clearpathrobotics.com> wrote:
>
>> -0
>>
>> Will these changes will affect nodes outside of the openni stack? If so,
>> can these effects be enumerated? Will we need to update all of the
>> TurtleBot demo code, for instance?
>>
>> Also, the REP does not state a clear motivation for doing this. Is what
>> we have causing problems, or is it just "not ideal"? #117<http://ros.org/reps/rep-0117.html> is
>> similar but concisely states reasons for why the work should be done, and
>> how it'll impact past code.
>>
>
> I didn't adequately explain the context of this REP. It proposes *no
> changes*, except to discourage use of the old and flawed
> sensor_msgs/DisparityImage message. The purpose is to codify and document
> the convention used by the OpenNI stack.
>
> Cheers,
> Patrick
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>