hi Tully,
I would like to participate.
Lorenzo
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Tully Foote <
tfoote@willowgarage.com>wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> In reviewing the state of ROS one of the things that is commonly sought in
> the community is better visibility into the status of packages. Whether
> packages are stable released software designed to be built on top of, or if
> the software is a one time release designed for a single experiment is
> sometimes very hard to tell. Also as people consider deploying ROS
> outside of research experiments reliability becomes much more important.
>
> To be able to make this happen we'd like to review/rewrite the ROS QA
> process.[1] And also while doing this we'd like to setup
> some verifiable tests to pass to achieve levels of certification, which can
> then be made visible on the wiki and/or in indexers to allow people to be
> able to have confidence in software that is downloaded.
>
> I'd like to kick off this process shortly after the groovy freeze, with a
> goal of having a working draft of the process
> and certification requirements by the end of October. The process will
> likely include a couple workshops, virtual or in person depending on the
> distribution of participants.
>
> To address this issue, I'd like to put out a call for participation in
> this working group. If you'd like to participate please contact me.
>
> Tully
>
> [1] http://www.ros.org/wiki/QAProcess
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
> --
> Lorenzo Riano, PhD
> Research Scientist
> EECS
> University of California Berkeley
> Berkeley, CA
> 94720
>
> email: <https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users>
> lorenzo.riano@berkeley.edu
> skype: lorenzo.riano
>
>
>
>
(text/plain)