Re: [Ros-release] Can we depend on 'ros' in stack.xml ?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jack O'Quin
Date:  
To: peter
CC: ros-release
Subject: Re: [Ros-release] Can we depend on 'ros' in stack.xml ?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Peter Soetens <>wrote:

> It appears that if we depend on 'ros' in our stack.xml, the 'devel'
> build is not done due to this message:
>
> <quote>
> devel_fuerte_orocos_toolchain_precise_amd64 - Build # 16 - Fixed:
>
> Check console output at
>
> http://build.willowgarage.com//job/devel_fuerte_orocos_toolchain_precise_amd64/16/
> to view the results.
>
> Result: Not all dependencies of stack orocos_toolchain have a Debian
> package. Skipping this devel build
>
> </quote>
>
> It tries to install ros-fuerte-ros, sees it's already there and then
> skips the build instead of proceeding...
>
> Can I just remove the dependency ? Will this not break other builds
> that do rely on it ?
>


I have been wondering about this, too. I see various messages complaining
about things depending on "ros".

Is it deprecated? When was it removed? What replaced it?
--
joq