It is harmless, but I want to use the license information for automatic checks of licensing issues.
So it might be nice if the information is set up correctly.
Lukas
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:
ros-users-bounces@code.ros.org [
mailto:ros-users-bounces@code.ros.org] Im Auftrag von Thibault Kruse
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Februar 2013 15:02
An:
ros-users@code.ros.org
Betreff: Re: [ros-users] What is LGPL licensed in roscpp_core metapackage?
On 08.02.2013 14:46, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Or is this simply a glitch in the package.xml and the line with LGPL should be removed?
It is a glitch., though harmless:
The licenses in the metapackage package.xml only affect the files inside the metapackage folder itself, so really only that package.xml itself.
Packages are not "part of" a metapackage, they are merely "referenced by" zero to many metapackages.
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)