Jonathan,
The ROS-I group is very interested in this. We would support an REP effort.
Are you aware if anybody is currently using a cartesian trajectory (this definition or any other)?
Shaun
________________________________
From:
ros-users-bounces@code.ros.org [
ros-users-bounces@code.ros.org] on behalf of Jonathan Bohren [
jonathan.bohren@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:45 PM
To: User discussions;
ros-sig-robot-control@googlegroups.com
Subject: [ros-users] cartesian trajectories
A long time back there was an API review for cartesian trajectory messages [1] but it'd be nice to standardize a ROS interface for cartesian manipulator goals and trajectories.
Is anyone interested in resuming this, maybe as an REP and ratifying it (or whatever we want to call the creation of message standards)?
[1]
http://www.ros.org/wiki/robot_mechanism_controllers/Reviews/Cartesian%20Trajectory%20Proposal%20API%20Review
--
Jonathan Bohren
Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics
http://dscl.lcsr.jhu.edu/People/JonathanBohren
(text/plain)