On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Dejan Pangercic <
dejan.pangercic@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Adolfo,
> >> > From a user perspective, I'm mostly interested in these qualities:
> >> > - Good and stable API
> >
> >
> > API stability can be tracked though proper versioning [1].
>
> Given the developer knows how to use that correctly. Otherwise I agree.
Unfortunately, many developers either do not know, or choose to abuse the
numbering conventions.
A recent example is PCL 1.7, which broke source compatibility with
virtually every ROS package using it. I have no complaint about removing
the ROS messages from PCL. That needed to be done.
But, the result should have been labelled 2.0, and there should have been a
tick-tock migration path for it. They ignored all that: easier for the PCL
developers, a major pain in the butt for everyone using it with ROS.
--
joq
(text/plain)