On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Brian Gerkey <
gerkey@osrfoundation.org>wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Wrede, Sebastian
> <swrede@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> > * How will services / RPC be implemented with DDS? Is there already an
> > accepted standard protocol for doing RPC over DDS?
>
> My understanding is: (i) the current DDS spec doesn't include what we
> call services; (ii) there's an extension for services that is
> currently under consideration and may make its way into a future
> revision of the spec; and (iii) some current implementations have
> vendor-specific extensions for services.
>
I know that many people feel otherwise, but in my personal opinion,
services are a bad idea anyway, and what we really want is something more
like (though not necessarily exactly the same) what actionlib offers. That
is, something which *explicitly* acknowledges that there are always
packets/messages underneath, that there is asynchronicity, and that there
may be impossibility to act *in the protocol*.
Just saying ;-)
cheers
--
Ingo Lütkebohle, Dr.-Ing.
Machine Learning and Robotics Lab, IPVS, Universität Stuttgart
http://www.ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de/abteilungen/mlr/abteilung/mitarbeiter/Ingo.Luetkebohle
+49-711-685-88350
PGP Fingerprint 3187 4DEC 47E6 1B1E 6F4F 57D4 CD90 C164 34AD CE5B
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)