On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Aravind Sundaresan
<
asundaresan@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are using ROS in a DARPA program where we need the communication between
> the master and nodes as well as the messaging to be secure. Is there anybody
> else who finds this important? Does DDS provide secure communications?
You're not alone in wanting secure communications for robotics. We
would be remiss in a major rewrite to completely ignore security
(which is not to say that we must implement security mechanisms, but
we'd better at least end up with a solid story about our approach to
security, with clear guidance to users).
As I understand it, there's a proposed extension to the DDS spec,
currently under review, to add security. Here's a relevant
presentation:
http://www.slideshare.net/GerardoPardo/dds-security-standard
But given that DDS is apparently used in so many mission-critical
applications, surely there's some encryption happening, perhaps in
non-standard vendor-specific ways that vary by implementation? Or
perhaps they're using DDS like we use ROS, where you're expected
secure your network.
brian.
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)