Thanks Tully. pre-release script now works fine without any issue.
- Mani
Mani Monajjemi
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Tully Foote via ros-release <
ros-release@lists.ros.org> wrote:
> I've pushed ros_buildfarm 0.2.1 it should now be usable from the debian
> packages.
>
> Tully
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:42 AM, William Woodall via ros-release <
> ros-release@lists.ros.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Jack O'Quin via ros-release <
>> ros-release@lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Stonier via ros-release <
>>> ros-release@lists.ros.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It has been a while since I've built open source debs, but this is
>>>> above and beyond the effort required to prerelease for me though. It used
>>>> to be such a fundamental part of the process - what is the current
>>>> thinking? Given that its been out for at least three months, are most
>>>> people just guessing, rebuilding on the farm, guessing again? Is there a
>>>> planned remedy on the horizon?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Basically, yes.
>>>
>>> Presently, the pre-release tests take more effort than just hoping for
>>> the best and then fixing things that break.
>>>
>>
>> Why? I've been using them for rviz and it seems to work fairly well.
>> What's holding up making them useful? It is just the need to install it
>> into a virtualenv first?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> My 2 cents - I'd really love to see this working again ;) ;) ;) ;)
>>>>
>>>
>> Again, what's not working? Is there an issue on Github tracking the
>> problem?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Saves alot of time for me not having to ping pong back and forth trying
>>>> to get my dependencies right and I'm sure it makes the job easier on the
>>>> other end avoiding having so many red blips on the radar so often.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 I would find it helpful, too. I much prefer running the tests.
>>>
>>> The pre-docker web interface was very convenient. I think this could be,
>>> too, although it's annoying that the Trusty version of docker is too old to
>>> use.
>>>
>>
>> There's nothing to be done about that unfortunately.
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> joq
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-release mailing list
>>> ros-release@lists.ros.org
>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William Woodall
>> ROS Development Team
>> william@osrfoundation.org
>> http://wjwwood.io/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-release mailing list
>> ros-release@lists.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-release mailing list
> ros-release@lists.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>
>
_______________________________________________
ros-release mailing list
ros-release@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
(text/plain)