[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] Suggestions for std_srvs

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Maarten de Vries via ros-users
Date:  
To: ros-users
Subject: [ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] Suggestions for std_srvs



I agree something like that would be very useful. I've used a package with a bunch of similar definitions myself.

I am curious about the distinction between get and set. You added `bool success; string message` to the setters but not the getters. Why do you think one should have them but not the other? Personally I'd lean to not having them at all. You can already report failure anyway in your service handler.






---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/suggestions-for-std-srvs/1079/2) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>