[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] ROS GNU GPL v1.2 issue

Gerkey - Thanks for replying. Extremely Sorry for my late response.

You are right on the LGPL on the header. For some reasons the blackduck tool (license scanning tool) classified this as GPL.

However, our legal team questions use of LGPL for production use. What is the guideline ROS provides for example use of xmlrpcpp included in the ROS core for production deployment?


Additionally, we noticed that stage and ivcon components are classified as GPL. These are part of ROS desktop. Will these be used more of a utility?

Appreciate your feedback.

Thanks.






---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-gnu-gpl-v1-2-issue/1642/3) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>