Nice effort! What about also define interfaces for annotations?
We also try to define "generic" interfaces:
https://github.com/tue-robotics/image_recognition/tree/master/image_recognition_msgs/msg
However, it's hard to capture things as:
- [Face Properties](
https://github.com/tue-robotics/image_recognition/blob/master/image_recognition_msgs/msg/FaceProperties.msg ): as a result from [Skybiometry for example](
https://github.com/tue-robotics/image_recognition/tree/master/skybiometry_ros)
- Poses e.g. [Openpose](
https://github.com/CMU-Perceptual-Computing-Lab/openpose)
I think you would also like to define something as detection or feature groups that belong together. Maybe take a look at how [GeoJson](
http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html) does it.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/proposal-new-computer-vision-message-standards/1819/2) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)