The previous comment from @tfoote still applies:
https://discourse.ros.org/t/std-shared-ptr-in-the-geometric-shapes-public-api/395/5
Changing from `boost` to `std` `shared_ptr` in e.g. ROS-M would require all consumers of that API to update their code. Each package needs to make that decision on its own. But for many "core" ROS packages that might simply not be feasible or desired. So this downside needs to be taken into account when considering such a change.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/c-11-std-shared-ptr-in-public-api/1990/6) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)