Hi Victor,
here just two comments:
- Did you already have a look at the content of this pull request
https://github.com/bmwcarit/meta-ros/pull/538? Is it done identical? Or can we merge those two developments to a best solution of those two in your repository?
- Concerning the license, I chose MIT just as most layers did use MIT when I started meta-ros. I think more important than the license of the metadata, is actually this further important remark on the license: "All metadata is MIT licensed unless otherwise stated. Source code included in tree for individual recipes is under the LICENSE stated in each recipe (.bb file) unless otherwise stated." This allows others to take your patch files and contribute and merge them back into the main development without further legal considerations.
Best regards,
Lukas
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835/5) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)