[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] Timestamps and ros…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Bence Magyar via ros-users
Date:  
To: ros-users
CC: Bence Magyar
Subject: [ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] Timestamps and rosbags: discussing an alternative to clock and use_sim_time


I think for a good portion of the use-cases this doesn't come up as
typically you wouldn't have more than 15-25 transforms in TF.

With more complex robots (humanoids, quadrupeds, etc) there's a significant
increase and that's where TF starts to fail. I'm not sure that problem is
with rosbag though...
I once thought of implementing an alternative way to capture the robot part
of TF by grabbing the urdf and joint states and let the
robot_state_publisher do it's job on the go. Never really got around to do
it...

I can't really recall a case when it wasn't TF failing. Could you bring an
example of something else failing with rosbag time?





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/timestamps-and-rosbags-discussing-an-alternative-to-clock-and-use-sim-time/3238/2) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>