[quote="dirk-thomas, post:13, topic:2015, full:true"]
[quote="joq, post:12, topic:2015, full:true"]
I like to see ament support in ROS 1.
In code I have seen, that could significantly reduce the diffs. For example, consider the diffs between the master and ros2 branches of the simple unique_identifier packages.
[/quote]
I agree with you that this would be great to have. But supporting `ament` in ROS 1 implies a tremendous effort which we are not sure atm we can and want to spend. There is no technical reason not to do it - only a problem of available resource. This "feature" could also be contributed by the community which makes it less "necessary" that OSRF is spending its sparse resources on.
[/quote]
This is off-topic, but: I haven't been paying attention to `ament` too much. Could you briefly describe what would be needed to get it to work with ROS1 (ie: what would the "tremendous effort" entail exactly)?
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/syncronized-callbacks-in-ros2/2015/14) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)