> I hope that consideration is given to that so that it does not become impossible in the future. It would be much better if we have a single C client library that works on all platforms, with features turned on and off as needed for resources and use cases. Otherwise there is a big risk of divergence.
Thats the goal, really, and anything else is totally not decided on, yet. "urcl" was just a placeholder name. While we initially thought that the architecture layering sketch was good to give a rough idea, I now see it may be interpreted to mean more than it does. Therefore, I updated the repository description at
https://github.com/microROS/micro-ROS to be a bit more generic ;-)
Remember, this is all open source, and takes inspiration from a lot of work, both the original ROS2 embedded attempts, rosserial, as well as, most recently, the RIOT work by @astralien3000 and colleagues.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ipc-in-ros2/2619/40) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)