Yes, re-implementing the roslaunch XML parser was a difficult design decision. In the end, I hope to arrive in a situation like HTML - one spec, multiple implementations. This has disadvantages (code duplication), but also advantages with regards to specialization and for finding problems in the spec itself.
In any case, thanks for testing and reporting your findings on GitHub. Did you have problems other than `pass_all_args` in `<include>` tags?
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/announcing-rosmon-interactive-ros-process-monitor/4643/3) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)