[quote="Kukanani, post:4, topic:6231"]
I would agree with the decision to avoid poor-performing packages to ROS2. In general, the large number of ROS1 packages can be daunting for someone who is just starting out, especially when its not immediately clear which of those packages are considered best practice or are even actively maintained. The ROS QA group should help alleviate this but I think the easiest way to make it clear is to simply not make older outdated packages available in ROS 2.
[/quote]
Probably it is not always just about performance but reliability in the architectural level as well:
https://discourse.ros.org/t/functional-safety-design-patterns/6364
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros2-perception-porting-status/6231/9) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)