[quote="facontidavide, post:81, topic:6155"]
This is not a a discussion about ROS2 vs ROS1 and if it was, it would be clearly ROS1 is sufficient for academic and hobbyists use, ROS2 is trying to solve multiple **important** issues that many industries are very concerned about.
[/quote]
[quote="facontidavide, post:83, topic:6155"]
But (and there is always a but), why cant we make **both** these communities happy?
[/quote]
My hope is that it would be possible, but my intuition is that one can't overstate how difficult it will be. Still, I would say it's *extremely unlikely* that one will satisfy (and leverage) all the relevant stakeholders if one doesn't first define who they are along with their abilities, needs, and constraints.
For instance, I don't even think that the aforementioned communities ("academia" and "industry") are the *only* two classes of stakeholder that we care about or even that each of those classes has a unified set of requirements.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/discussion-on-ros-to-ros2-transition-plan/6155/85) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)