[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] Introducting Beha…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Michael Jeronimo via ros-users
Date:  
To: ros-users
CC: Michael Jeronimo
Subject: [ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [General] Introducting BehaviorTrees.CPP (who needs Finite State Machines anymore?)


To add to what Matt has said: We're using the BehaviorTree.CPP library for the new ROS2 Navigation2 package and are taking advantage of the new blackboard feature as well as the XML-to-BT capability that allows one to define the Behavior Tree in XML and automatically create the corresponding BT at run-time. These are the features I was looking for in a BT library for our mission execution and navigation code. I'm just starting to experiment with the Groot editor, but plan to interactively create and test BTs with our system.





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/introducting-behaviortrees-cpp-who-needs-finite-state-machines-anymore/6899/4) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>