[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [Next Generation ROS] Adding…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Geoffrey Biggs via Discourse.ros.org via ros-users
Date:  
To: ros-users
CC: Geoffrey Biggs via Discourse.ros.org
Subject: [ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [Next Generation ROS] Adding clang thread safety analysis for ROS2 core packages


How does the analysis handle threads that are not annotated? For example, threads inside the DDS implementation.

I noticed in your proof of concept that there are places where locks have been added and places where they have been removed. Is this for the analysis or because the analysis found errors?





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/adding-clang-thread-safety-analysis-for-ros2-core-packages/7930/2) or reply to this email to respond.


If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list

http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>