@emersonknapp Thanks for your complete and well thought out proposal. Hopefully this can be a good example for others going forward.
Overall we have general support for a utility package with a scope like `rcpputils` in parallel with `rcutils` here. There are several utility functions in rclcpp that could be refactored out into this package too in the future.
There was some discussion about whether there might be another more generic package scope. But there wasn't any strong alternative proposals so lets go ahead with this as proposed.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/adding-clang-thread-safety-analysis-for-ros2-core-packages/7930/9) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)