You can find the version number by going to:
* ChangeList
* Releases
both of which are linked by the StackHeader. We do not include the
version number on the stack page itself because a stack may have
multiple versions active.
We are migrating our backend to generate documentation across multiple
versions of a stack, in which case we can start producing
version-specific stack pages, but that will take awhile to do.
- Ken
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <
konradb3@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking about stack but i wrote package.
> I never looked into CMakeList.txt in stacks, so i missed version number
> there.
> If there is tool which can parse CMakeList.txt and get version number, I
> don't see a point in including version elsewhere.
> It would be great if version can be included in stack header on wiki.
> Pozdrawiam
> Konrad Banachowicz
>
>
> 2010/10/25 Ken Conley <kwc@willowgarage.com>
>>
>> Hi Konrad,
>>
>> As Tully notes, we don't version individual packages, only stacks. We
>> used to include versions numbers in stack.xml files, but came to the
>> opinion that it was a mistake as you would get version disagreements
>> between the stack.xml, which is not authoritative, and the
>> CMakeLists.txt file, which is. We decided to just maintain one version
>> number in the CMakeLists.txt for now, though this will change once our
>> install target develops more.
>>
>> The "rosversion" command for ROS 1.3 has been updated to output the
>> version number of any installed stack.
>>
>> - Ken
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Tully Foote <tfoote@willowgarage.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Konrad,
>> > These things are not appropriate for the manifest as packages are not
>> > versioned, and a single version may or may not be used in multiple
>> > distributions. Can you provide a little bit more information on your
>> > usecase and where it's failing? In particular what you are doing and
>> > what
>> > you want it to be doing.
>> >
>> > Tully
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> I found that it's quite difficult to get information what is the
>> >> version
>> >> of the package and on what distribution it's intended to run.
>> >> So i think this information should be included in manifest.xml of the
>> >> packages.
>> >> Pozdrawiam
>> >> Konrad Banachowicz
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> ros-users mailing list
>> >> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tully Foote
>> > Systems Engineer
>> > Willow Garage, Inc.
>> > tfoote@willowgarage.com
>> > (650) 475-2827
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ros-users mailing list
>> > ros-users@code.ros.org
>> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>