[ros-release] Travis CI for Indigo

[Dave Coleman]

I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has anyone
found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs
Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by
https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046

So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo branch.
Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e.
https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490

Thanks!

dave coleman


On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM, <ros-release-request at code.ros.org> wrote:

> Send ros-release mailing list submissions to
>         ros-release at code.ros.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         ros-release-request at code.ros.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         ros-release-owner at code.ros.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700
> From: Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
> To: The ROS release mailing list <ros-release at code.ros.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions
>         ?
> Message-ID:
>         <CAM7qi7U9NcH6-drP82rPTU=Rp8C=
> jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we have
> not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built into
> the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that.
>
> With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in
> Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but
> the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to update
> the rosdep rule.
>
>
> Link online:
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names
>
> >From saucy/amd64 Packages file:
> Package: libgphoto2-6-dev
> Priority: optional
> Section: libdevel
> Installed-Size: 11550
> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <
> pkg-phototools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> Architecture: amd64
> Source: libgphoto2
> Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5
> Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev
> Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev,
> libc-dev, pkg-config
> Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev
> Filename:
> pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb
> Size: 3340498
> MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179
> SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f
> SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019
> Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files)
> Homepage: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/
> Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0
> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
> Origin: Ubuntu
> Supported: 9m
>
>
>
> Tully
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in the
> > past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy (
> >
> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/
> > simply because for some reason,
> > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev was not released in
> > Saucy).
> > Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining 10
> > Ubuntu distributions.
> >
> > Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once it's
> > out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to back
> > that up ? Docs for what to drop here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
> > That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper).
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-release mailing list
> > ros-release at code.ros.org
> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-release mailing list
> ros-release at code.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>
>
> End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140908/b7a9c65d/attachment.html>