[ros-release] Travis CI for Indigo

Tue Sep 9 16:57:10 UTC 2014

So the options I see:

   - Stop using Travis - can Jenkins do the same thing? Other CIs?
   - Release debians of ROS for Precise - very difficult/def. not worth the
   time
   - Somehow entice Travis developers (donations with money I don't have)
   - Build our own continuous integration servers - also difficult

dave
325.261.3283 c

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dave Coleman <davetcoleman at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has anyone
> found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs
> Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by
> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046
>
> So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo branch.
> Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e.
> https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490
>
> Thanks!
>
> dave coleman
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM, <ros-release-request at code.ros.org> wrote:
>
>> Send ros-release mailing list submissions to
>>         ros-release at code.ros.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         ros-release-request at code.ros.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         ros-release-owner at code.ros.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700
>> From: Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
>> To: The ROS release mailing list <ros-release at code.ros.org>
>> Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions
>>         ?
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAM7qi7U9NcH6-drP82rPTU=Rp8C=
>> jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we have
>> not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built into
>> the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that.
>>
>> With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in
>> Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but
>> the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to update
>> the rosdep rule.
>>
>>
>> Link online:
>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names
>>
>> >From saucy/amd64 Packages file:
>> Package: libgphoto2-6-dev
>> Priority: optional
>> Section: libdevel
>> Installed-Size: 11550
>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
>> Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <
>> pkg-phototools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
>> Architecture: amd64
>> Source: libgphoto2
>> Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5
>> Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev
>> Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev,
>> libc-dev, pkg-config
>> Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev
>> Filename:
>> pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb
>> Size: 3340498
>> MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179
>> SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f
>> SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019
>> Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files)
>> Homepage: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/
>> Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0
>> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
>> Origin: Ubuntu
>> Supported: 9m
>>
>>
>>
>> Tully
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in
>> the
>> > past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy (
>> >
>> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/
>> > simply because for some reason,
>> > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev was not released in
>> > Saucy).
>> > Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining 10
>> > Ubuntu distributions.
>> >
>> > Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once
>> it's
>> > out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to back
>> > that up ? Docs for what to drop here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
>> > That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper).
>> >
>> > Thoughts ?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ros-release mailing list
>> > ros-release at code.ros.org
>> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-release mailing list
>> ros-release at code.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>
>>
>> End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3
>> ******************************************
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140909/99c16747/attachment-0001.html>