[ros-users] Joint limits yaml

[Ben Rudder]

Ok no worries Sachin, I just wasn't sure if it was purposeful or not. I just
saw it and thought it peculiar as I was trying to adapt it to our robot.
They were all 0.1 different, so I thought maybe it was a safety... but then
that confused me cause errors would arise. I'll correct it in my own too
then. I was going to mention the acquisition of the elements from the urdf,
and the lack of acceleration in the urdf, but that's exactly your ticket.
Great :)

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Sachin Chitta <sachinc at willowgarage.com>wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
> I have a ticket open on this very issue:
> https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/ticket/4118
>
> The joint limits information in the future (once I service the ticket) will
> come from the urdf with the option of overriding the urdf using the
> specification in the yaml file.
>
> Sachin
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Ben Rudder <b.rudder382 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi again all
>>
>> Just a question, with pr2_arm_navigation stack, in particular
>> .._config/config/joint_limits.yaml , is there a reason that the limits
>> specified here are outside the defined limits in the urdf files?
>>
>> Thanks, Ben
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users at code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sachin Chitta
> Research Scientist
> Willow Garage
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20100527/38329d01/attachment-0003.html>