[ros-users] ROS Fuerte Beta 1 Now Available

[Traveler]

I can make a ros specific PCL package (there is no 'official' pcl 
package). What do I need to do to get rosdep rospackage to recognize 
that it's installed?

On 04/04/2012 06:36 PM, Ken Conley wrote:
> ROS uses a modified version of PCL.  As you are on Arch, there
> currently is no packaging for this alternate version of PCL.  Most
> system dependencies are equivalent, but PCL shares message data
> structures and thus requires alternate build flags to be compatible
> with ROS.
>
> The trees that we use to build various system dependencies within our
> installation prefix can be found here:
>
> https://github.com/wg-debs
>
> I don't know of the correct way to deal with this on Arch.
>
>   - Ken
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Traveler Hauptman
> <traveler.hauptman at iit.it>  wrote:
>> BTW This dependency error from rospack is contrary to rosdep which finds
>> pcl.
>>
>>
>> On 4/04/2012 3:42 p.m., Traveler wrote:
>>
>> 4. rosmake appears to happily build the things that don't depend on pcl.
>> I get a compiler error for pcl_ros and for a bunch of things I get a
>> dependency error like:
>>
>> [rosbuild] Building package depth_image_proc
>>     Failed to invoke /opt/ros/fuerte/bin/rospack deps-manifests
>> depth_image_proc
>>     [rospack] Error: package/stack depth_image_proc depends on
>> non-existent package pcl
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA
>>
>> Traveler Hauptman
>> Computer Imaging
>> traveler.hauptman at iit.it
>>
>> Via Morego, 30 16163 Genova
>> t: +39 010 71781929
>>
>> Legal Disclaimer
>> This electronic message contains information that is confidential. The
>> information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not
>> the addressee we would appreciate your notification in this respect. Please
>> note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> message is prohibited and may be unlawful. We have taken every reasonable
>> precaution to ensure that any kind of attachment to this e-mail has been
>> swept for viruses. However, we cannot accept liability for any damage
>> sustained as a result of software viruses and would advise you to carry out
>> your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Avvertenza legale
>> Questo messaggio Email contiene informazioni confidenziali riservate ai soli
>> destinatari. Qualora veniate in possesso di tali informazioni senza essere
>> definito come destinatario vi preghiamo di leggere le seguenti note. Ogni
>> apertura, copia, distribuzione del contenuto del messaggio e dei suoi
>> allegati è proibito e potrebbe violare le presenti leggi. Abbiamo attivato
>> ogni possibile e ragionevole precauzione per assicurare che gli allegati non
>> contengano virus. Comunque non assumeremo alcuna responsabilità per ogni
>> eventuale danno causato da virus software e simili in quanto è onere del
>> destinatario verificarne l'assenza in ogni allegato attuando propri
>> indipendenti controlli.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users at code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users