[ros-users] New Documentation Generation and Indexing for ros.org

[Mani Monajjemi]

Hi,

I've noticed that, many
<https://www.google.com/search?q=The%20doc%20job%20status%20for%20is%20currently%20UNSTABLE>wiki
page<https://www.google.com/search?q=The%20doc%20job%20status%20for%20is%20currently%20UNSTABLE>
s<https://www.google.com/search?q=The%20doc%20job%20status%20for%20is%20currently%20UNSTABLE>
generated
by the new system has this error in their headers:

*The doc job status for <package-distro> is currently UNSTABLE. See jenkins
for details.

*I went through the jenkin's console outputs and I found different errors
for different packages. Is it the task of package maintainers to solve the
problems or is there any problems with the new system? Some errors are
weird, like "


[rospack] Error: package/stack <package> depends on non-existent package roscpp

"
*
*Best,
Mani


On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Eitan Marder-Eppstein <eitan at hidof.com>wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> So, as part of the infrastructure changes that we're making for ROS
> Groovy, we've revamped the way documentation generation and indexing works.
> The new system handles cross-referencing of Doxygen properly, is capable of
> documenting catkin packages, and can run documentation generation with
> independent jobs for each repository indexed. To support this new system,
> there is a new documentation generation tool for ROS called rosdoc_lite,
> which is a stripped down version of rosdoc that adds support for Doxygen
> cross-references and catkin. For more information on using rosdoc_lite as a
> standalone tool, please see http://ros.org/wiki/rosdoc_lite.
>
> Since catkin packages were never properly documented and indexed in
> Fuerte, we've also decided to roll out this new documentation indexer for
> Fuerte in addition to Groovy. This means that, if you have Fuerte or Groovy
> packages that you'd like to have indexed and documented on ros.org,
> you'll need to register them with the new indexing system. For detailed
> instructions on how to add your packages to the index, please see this
> page<http://www.ros.org/wiki/Get%20Involved#Indexing_Your_.2A-ros-pkg_Repository_for_Documentation_Generation>,
> but it should be as simple as creating a rosinstall file for your stack,
> metapackage, or repository group.
>
> The new documentation also comes with updated wiki macros for generating
> package and stack headers on ros.org. These headers have tabs for
> diamondback, electric, fuerte, and groovy that you can easily switch
> between. They also allow you to include distro specific information with
> each package (much like with the version macro). For more information on
> these new headers, and how they work, please see:
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/WikiMacros. Since they are backwards compatible,
> we've already switched the wiki over.
>
> On a logistical note, we're already using the new indexer to build
> documentation for Groovy packages, but have not switched the wiki over to
> use the new indexer for Fuerte quite yet. First, we want to make sure that
> the community has a chance to add their packages to the indexer. So, within
> the next two weeks, please take some time to add any package you maintain
> to the indexer. Once again, to do this, please follow the instructions
> here <http://www.ros.org/wiki/Get%20Involved#Fuerte_and_later>.
>
> Some useful pages:
>
> Tickets for rosdoc_lite (
> https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rosdoc_lite/issues)
> Tickets for indexing system (
> https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/jenkins_scripts/issues)
>
> Hope all is well,
>
> Eitan
>
> --
> Eitan Marder-Eppstein
> President, hiDOF Inc.
> http://www.hidof.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20121105/640e1de6/attachment-0004.html>