[ros-users] Request for comment REP 127

[William Woodall]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, tkruse <tibokruse at googlemail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:06:49 PM UTC+2, William Woodall wrote:
>
>> * Attributes "brief" and "email" could be tags as well, based on the
>>> rationale given in the REP
>>>
>>
>> I don't think making emails into tags makes much sense, because then
>> there is no relationship between specific author/email pairs, but brief
>> could be a separate tag, but being an attribute might encourage people to
>> make them briefer.
>>
>
> That would be:
> <author>
> <name>xyz</author>
> <email>xyz at xyz.com</email>
> </author>
>

Sure that makes sense.


>
> * The naming convention for the name tag differ from:
>>> http://www.ros.org/wiki/Naming (lowercase, dashes?, must start with
>>> letter)
>>> * dashes in the name???
>>>
>>
>> I agree, when you consider the recommendation to make the containing
>> folder match the name, dashes don't make sense.
>>
>
> There are more problems, such as using the package name in generated code
> for variable names and such.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ROS Buildsystem Special Interest Group" group.
> To post to this group, send email to ros-sig-buildsystem at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> ros-sig-buildsystem+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ros-sig-buildsystem/-/j0QUlqosYNkJ.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
William Woodall
Willow Garage - Software Engineer
wwoodall at willowgarage.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20120913/545655ad/attachment-0004.html>