[ros-users] REP 144 - ROS Package Naming

[Austin Hendrix]

Wonderful! It’s nice to see more formal standards for naming conventions.

Two comments:
 
It would be nice to give a few examples for the prefix rules.

Are there any rules for robot-specific configurations for other packages; for example navigation and moveit?

-Austin

On Mar 1, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> after not knowing how to properly name packages for NAO, I wrote a REP for how to name ROS packages:
> https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/blob/master/rep-0144.rst
> The original discussion with awesome reviewers happened at:
> https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/pull/94
> 
> The draft is now in the process of becoming official (or rejected) so if you have any feedback, please continue the discussion here:
> https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/pull/96
> 
> Thx,
> Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at lists.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20150301/9ac48dd7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20150301/9ac48dd7/attachment.asc>