If it looks like a dog, and barks like a dog, why not put it in
dog_experimental?
So if you are publishing an image and a camera info with the standard
directory structure, it sounds like a good candidate for
camera_drivers_experimental.
How are you dealing with calibration?
Blaise
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 09:44 -0500, Patrick Beeson wrote:
> I think I'll have some time later this week to update my ROS Swissranger
> 3000/4000 driver with appropriate image_proc info. Radu and I had
> discussed this replacing his older 3K node, as this is basically a port
> of that to work with the newer Mesa Imaging API.
>
> I think having this driver in the camera_drivers_experimental would be
> fine, as the device is essentially a camera that publishes multiple 2D
> images along with a point cloud (I'll make this a runtime option). Any
> objections to locating a 3D flash lidar driver in the
> camera_drivers_experimental stack?
>
>
> Patrick Beeson
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)