On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:02 -0700, "Josh Faust"
<
jfaust@willowgarage.com> wrote:
> Why do you think log4cxx is unmaintained? It hasn't had a
> release for a while, but it's quite stable in our experience.
> log4cxx was the best option when first creating rosconsole ~2
> years ago, and I haven't seen any new software that changes that
> (boost.log has potential, but is unproven and won't be available
> on most of our target platforms for years).
Google has a logging library available now. I haven't used it, so I
can't say if it's better than log4cxx or not.
Geoff
(text/plain)