image_pipeline is still due for a significant overhaul before Diamondback.
That was scheduled for November, but got pushed back as I've been busy with
other things. Approximate synchronization in stereo_image_proc will
definitely happen in Diamondback.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Blaise Gassend <
blaise@willowgarage.com>wrote:
> >> As ticket #4217 said, one good option would be to create a stereo
> >> version of the driver, which could publish both images with the same
> >> time stamp. This could be done in time for Diamondback, if there's a
> >> consensus that it's needed. I don't mind doing the work, though I'd
> >> need to borrow or acquire a suitable pair of stereo cameras for
> >> testing.
> >
> > That would be great. I would definitively test and give feedback about
> that.
>
> I think it would make more sense to volunteer to improve the
> stereo_image_proc node, rather than putting that change into the
> camera driver. It may be too late to add that to stereo_image_proc,
> unfortunately. Though I would argue that adding a parameter won't
> break anything downstream of image_pipeline.
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
(text/plain)