Re: [ros-users] [PCL-users] release vs relwithdebinfo

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Radu Bogdan Rusu
Date:  
To: Nizar Khalifa Sallem
CC: Point Cloud Library \(PCL\) mailing list, ros-users@code.ros.org
Subject: Re: [ros-users] [PCL-users] release vs relwithdebinfo
Interesting suggestion.

I am not sure if creating extra -dbg puts a large burden on our debian package generation system, but if it doesn't,
that sounds like a great idea!

Thanks for the feedback!

PS. We have the same problem with many libraries not just PCL. I was talking about PCL in my e-mail because that's the
one we tested.

Cheers,
Radu.
--
http://pointclouds.org

On 02/22/2011 12:24 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
>> For example, there are numerous libraries in the Ubuntu repositories that provide both a -dbg and a regular version. One example: the GNU C library has both the "libc6" package, as
>> well as the "libc6-dbg" package that provides debugging symbols (or a version that doesn't have debugging symbols stripped out). I'm a bit fuzzy on exactly what they are doing, but
>> my point is that they have two separate packages, one with debugging symbols and one without and I get to choose which to install. Could PCL do something similar?