Sorry for me being slow on REP 110.
I updated the REP document still on
http://code.in.tum.de/indefero/index.php//p/rosinstall2/source/tree/master/rosinstall-REP.txt
For now I suggest in the REP to use rosws as name. I cut down the
diverse commands init, update, add, remove, ... to just install. Which
makes the REP look a bit silly, as I list 18 use cases most of which now
are served by "manually update your .rosinstall, then run 'rosws install .'"
To reduce the wait time for the features I might, if Tully agrees,
provide status, diff, info as -- options in rosinstall as it is, then
the REP would really just change the syntax, not introduce features.
regards,
Thibault
(text/plain)