Re: [ros-users] rospkg API review (REP 114)

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Dirk Thomas <mail@dirk-thomas.net> wrote:

> Good suggestion. As this is the behavior of rospack, I changed rospkg
>> to match it by default. You can get the raw export by adding a
>> "convert=False" arg to the get_export() call instead.
>>
>
> great, thank you.
>
>
> A minor cosmetic issue is the printing of "READ_CACHE manifest.xml" in
>>> rospkg/rospack.py:188.
>>> I guest this output will be removed in the next release?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this has already been removed. I pushed 0.2.3 with the fix as
>> well as updated get_export() API.
>>
>
> It would be useful if the version number of rospkg could be determined.
> This is not yet possible, right?
> So could you also add a function which returns the version number of
> rospkg?
>

Great idea. Added in the next version:

$ python -c "import rospkg; print rospkg.__version__"
0.2.4



>
> Thank you,
>
> Dirk
> ______________________________**_________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/**listinfo/ros-users<https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users>
>