Re: [ros-users] libopencv

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] libopencv
A Divendres 11 Novembre 2011, Jochen Sprickerhof va escriure:
> * Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <> [2011-11-11 11:26]:
> > A Dijous 10 Novembre 2011, Jochen Sprickerhof va escriure:
> > > * Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <> [2011-11-10 18:03]:
> > > [..]
> > > > well, I agree with you. It's frustrating for the Debian people (at

last
> > for
> > > > me) cannot compile (or create) the debs packages of ros. Also, I would
> > like to
> > > > introduce the problem that for a system admin, like me, ros works so

well
> > in a
> > > > box alone, with one user that it's also root(sudo), but it's not easy

to
> > > > maintain a group of boxes with ros if you don't want to give sudo
> > permissions
> > > > to the users.
> > >
> > > what's your problem here? Apart from ps3joy.py (which could run as a
> > > service) and sixpair I haven't found a problem till now.
> >
> > well my problem is basically that I don't have packages for a debian
> > distribution. So, if you have a group of boxes and a group of users that

use
> > ros, you have to take care how to install ros in the different boxes.
>
> I haven't tried for Debian stable but as I mentioned, for testing and
> unstable the debs are working fine.


I'm sure that you will have some dependency problem is some moment. Otherwise,
you are using Ubuntu as a Debian testing/Unstable distro.

>
> > If the boxes are similar (amd64 or i386) you can make one installation and
> > then rsync between boxes or share the directory (nfs, samba, etc).
>
> I'm installing Debian (or Ubuntu) as normal, add ROS to the sources,
> install it and you are done.
>
> > Another problem is that the default umask in a debian distro is 0022 or

0002,
> > so you have to take care that all the users have the umask adecuately in

the
> > way that if they compile a package, all the users group could erase or
> > recompile that package.
>
> Why would you allow users to erase or recompile packages?
>


well, not always you have installed ALL the stacks, etc.

> The concept
> is, that you have one system installation and users create overlays with
> what they need in addition.


yes, I agree. Maybe I have to rethink my installation.

Thanks for the info.

Best regards,

Leo



--
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia