Re: [ros-users] REP 116 pluginlib extension

Forside
Vedhæftede filer:
Indlæg som e-mail
+ (text/plain)
Slet denne besked
Besvar denne besked
Skribent: User discussions
Dato:  
Til: User discussions
Emne: Re: [ros-users] REP 116 pluginlib extension
> - There is a strict separation of build products from what gets
> checked out of source control; that is, the build and source
> directories for packageN will be different. libpackageN.so and
> packageN/somepython.py will exist in completely different places
> before installation, and these places will be different when "built"
> and after installation.
>
> - "/path/to/stacks/stackN/packageN" won't exist, per se. But
> /path/to/share/packageN/anything_you_like may exist (if packageN
> chooses to install things that way). The point is that /path/to will
> be the CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX, and under this prefix things will be
> installed in as FHS-ish a scheme as possible.


What package-path will be returned in this "installed" scenario?
Either when using C++: ros::package::getPath("packageN") or in Python: rospkg.RosPack().get_path('packageN')

Dirk