Thank you Dejan.
It seems to be exactly what I was looking for.
Gaëtan
On 06/04/2012 11:44, Dejan Pangercic wrote:
> Gaetan,
> I think that it would make more sense to go with the multimaster:
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/fuerte/Planning/Multimaster
>
> D.
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Gaetan Severac<Gaetan.Severac@onera.fr> wrote:
>> Hi ROS Users,
>>
>> I am wondering if there any work done about decentralise architecture for
>> ROS. I mean connection and exchange of services between nodes without the
>> need of a ROS Master, in an "ad hok mode".
>>
>> I found no information about this neither in the Wiki, FAQ or ROS Answer
>> pages.
>>
>> If you have some information about previous or ongoing work on the subject
>> I'm interested !
>>
>> By advance thank you.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gaëtan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
(text/plain)