Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. I definitely agree that the link with the
multi-master/multi-robot question is relevant.
I wonder also how that would fit in/with the "Next Generation/IDL"
SIGs:
http://ros.org/wiki/groovy/Planning/RosNG / msgIDL /nodeIDL
I would think that this could be kept orthogonal, but feedback from
the organisers there would be helpful.
Best
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Rousseau <
jrousseau@aptima.com>
<
jrousseau@aptima.com> wrote:
> Having a ROS Transport SIG would be great. Discussions of various
> transports have come up now and again on the multi-master SIG list which I
> think conflates the two topics. Each (multi-robot/multi-master and
> transports), although often related, should really be addressed separately.
>
>
>
--
Cedric Pradalier
(text/plain)